CBEC releases Form APAF-1
for filing anti-profiteering application before Standing Committee / State
level Screening Committee in terms of Rule 128 of CGST Rules; As per the law,
suppliers of goods & services must pass on any reduction in tax rate or
benefit of ITC to consumers by way of commensurate reduction in prices; If this
is not done, consumer’s interest is protected by National Anti-profiteering
Authority which may order – (a) reduction in prices, (b) return of amount not
passed on with interest @ 18% to recipient, (c) imposition of penalty, and (d)
cancellation of supplier’s registration; Affected consumers can file
application before Standing Committee if profiteering has all-India character
or before State level Screening Committee if profiteering is of local nature;
Format inter alia provides for general information about the applicant, general
information about supplier who has not passed on the benefit, particulars of
goods / services including actual price / value charged per unit pre & post
GST, and comparative per unit actual price / value of like goods / services
charged by other suppliers, as well as details of reduction in tax rate / ITC
benefit; Applicant must give details of input taxes / duties per unit, credit
of which was not available to supplier before implementation of GST : CBEC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment