CBEC releases Form APAF-1
for filing anti-profiteering application before Standing Committee / State
level Screening Committee in terms of Rule 128 of CGST Rules; As per the law,
suppliers of goods & services must pass on any reduction in tax rate or
benefit of ITC to consumers by way of commensurate reduction in prices; If this
is not done, consumer’s interest is protected by National Anti-profiteering
Authority which may order – (a) reduction in prices, (b) return of amount not
passed on with interest @ 18% to recipient, (c) imposition of penalty, and (d)
cancellation of supplier’s registration; Affected consumers can file
application before Standing Committee if profiteering has all-India character
or before State level Screening Committee if profiteering is of local nature;
Format inter alia provides for general information about the applicant, general
information about supplier who has not passed on the benefit, particulars of
goods / services including actual price / value charged per unit pre & post
GST, and comparative per unit actual price / value of like goods / services
charged by other suppliers, as well as details of reduction in tax rate / ITC
benefit; Applicant must give details of input taxes / duties per unit, credit
of which was not available to supplier before implementation of GST : CBEC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment