Kolkata ITAT rules that
payment received by assessee (a US company engaged in manufacturing and sale of
bearings) from its Indian subsidiary (‘TIL’) towards reimbursement of expenses
for the services provided by third parties, not taxable during AYs 2002-03 to
2007-08, as assessee was not the ultimate beneficiary of the sum in question
nor did it render any service to TIL; ITAT notes that expenses claimed as
reimbursement included legal expenses, training, inspection & survey
expenses, airfare, local conveyance, etc., further notes that the actuals
billed by the third parties were paid by the assessee in USA and were later on
reimbursed by TIL to assessee; ITAT remarks that “there is no basis for the AO
to conclude that the payment of reimbursements were in the nature of FTS”,
furthermore ITAT notes that the assessee made no profit on such reimbursements;
Separately, ITAT holds that payment received by assessee for rendering intra
group services to TIL was not taxable, notes that pursuant to agreement with TIL,
assessee agreed to render various services (like management services,
information resources, communication services, engineering services,
Metallurgical services, tool design services, planning and inventory management
services, quality assurance services, etc.) on cost basis to TIL, which were
purely advisory in nature; Further observes that nothing was made available to
TIL, cites MOU to India USA DTAA to hold that consideration for advisory
services cannot be treated as fees for included services (‘FIS’) under Article
12(4)(b), moreover, absent PE in India, ITAT holds that income cannot be taxed
under Article 7 as ‘business profits’ either:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Big Brother is Counting: How the Taxman Knows About Your Stock Sales and FD Interest
Let’s start with a small story in this regard. Mr. A, a mid-level software engineer, felt incredibly confident about his tax return last...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
CIT vs. Kan Construction And Colonizers (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) The assessee sold a plot of land for Rs. 79 lakhs. The AO held th...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment