HC
upholds order of CESTAT allowing MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of Central Excise
Rules, 1944 on inputs found defective, unfit for use on production floor in
factory premises; Accepts assessee’s contention that R&D tests during which
inputs were destroyed / become waste are integral to manufacturing of watches
and therefore, MODVAT credit cannot be denied in terms of Rule 57A r/w Rule
57D; Notes CESTAT’s categorical finding that assessee had reversed credit
availed at the time of receipt, upon discovering inputs / parts of watches
unfit for use and during course of manufacture, certain inputs were found
defective / lost; Further remarks that MODVAT credit cannot be denied by
applying provisions of Rule 57D when duty has indeed been paid; Perusal of Rule
57A(4) indicates that MODVAT credit is available on inputs used in final
products manufacture or in or in relation thereto whether directly or
indirectly, hence, it is not required that said inputs should be contained in
final product : Delhi HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment