HC
upholds Tribunal’s adoption of 10% gross profit for working out deemed sales
value of goods transferred during works contract execution, under Tamil Nadu
VAT Act, 2006 (TNVAT Act); Dismisses assessee's contention that Tribunal failed
to consider assessee’s books of accounts and that adoption of thumb rule of 10%
Gross Profit disregarding the actual gross profit as certified by CA
was based merely on surmises and approximation; Finds that
Tribunal, on noting that assessee did not maintain proper accounts and
failed to produce related records, affirmed adoption of conventional
method of 10% notional gross profit on purchase effected for arriving at deemed
sales turnover; Also rejects assessee’s plea of natural justice principles
violation, as well as its reliance on Income Tax ruling of Kerala HC in Joseph
Thomas & Bros’ wherein it was held except assessment u/s 144, opportunity
of being heard, shall be given in respect of any material gathered
basis any enquiry; Holds that, adoption of 10% gross profit is in
vogue ever since introduction of Section 3B of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax
Act, 1959 and continues even for liabilities relating to Section 5 of TNVAT Act
: Madras HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
P&H HC holds exporter eligible for refund of interest paid under Rule 96A on subsequent realisation of export proceeds
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) 1 on the validity of paragraph 4.6 of Circular No. ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
E very non-resident individual or organisation should obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) number if they receive an income and...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
No comments:
Post a Comment