Cabinet approves signing
and ratification of protocol amending India-China DTAA; Protocol will
incorporate changes required to implement treaty related minimum standards
under the BEPS project; Besides minimum standards, the Protocol will also bring
in changes as per BEPS Action reports as agreed upon by two sides; Further,
Protocol updates the existing provisions for exchange of information to the
latest international standards
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Safe Harbour vs. Advance Pricing Agreements: Choosing the Right Path to Transfer Pricing Certainty
While Safe Harbour focuses on standardization, an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) provides a customized solution. An APA is a binding agr...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
The posting had been move to another website. Please click the link below to get the access of the same. https://taxofindia.wordpress....
-
The Reserve Bank of India has introduced a new framework governing export and import transactions under FEMA. These regulations are effectiv...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is warranted even if assessee makes false claim of Sec 80IA benefits ...
-
What is a Digital Signature? Answer: A digital signature authenticates electronic documents in a similar manner a handwritten signatur...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on whether a show cause notice (SCN) under Section 74 of the ...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Gujarat High Court (HC)1 on the taxability of corporate guarantee provided by the Petitio...
-
The overall effective tax rate of a U.S. multinational corporation may have significant impact on the value of its stock. Therefore, it ...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
No comments:
Post a Comment