Bombay HC expresses
discontent over unsatisfactory state of affairs, terming GST regime “not tax
friendly”, while presiding over writ petition seeking grievance redressal
against lack of access to GST portal despite registration; Notes that
petitioner is unable to inter alia file necessary returns, particularly Form
GSTR-3B, thereby attracting late fee for period from October 207 onwards, and
generate E-way bill; HC states, “It is not the business of this Court to grant
such access as is claimed by the petitioner. It is for the authorities to work
out the necessary mechanism and set that in place” while directing authorities
to set up and establish grievance redressal mechanism; Noting that Revenue
could not give a definite answer on whether petitioner’s grievance would be
projected and raised before GST Council or not, HC observes, “A tax like
Goods and Services Tax was highly publicised and termed as popular. We had yet
not seen a celebration of New Tax regime, but that has followed with great hue
and cry. These celebrations mean nothing. The special sessions of Parliament or
special or extraordinary meetings of Council would mean nothing to the
assessees unless they obtain easy access to the website and portals.”; Hopes
that those in charge of implementation and administration of GST law would at
least now wake up and put in place requisite mechanism so as to preserve the
image, prestige and reputation of country, and lists matter on February 16
while noting Allahabad HC’s direction to reopen GST portal in a similar
grievance : Bombay HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
P&H HC holds exporter eligible for refund of interest paid under Rule 96A on subsequent realisation of export proceeds
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) 1 on the validity of paragraph 4.6 of Circular No. ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
E very non-resident individual or organisation should obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) number if they receive an income and...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
No comments:
Post a Comment