The Inclusive Framework on
BEPS releases additional guidance to give certainty to tax administrations and
MNE Groups on the implementation of Country-by-Country (CbC) Reporting under
BEPS Action 13; Additional guidance addresses 2 specific issues – a) definition
of total consolidated group revenue and b) whether non-compliance with the
confidentiality, appropriate use and consistency conditions constitutes
systemic failure; On the first issue, OECD Guidance clarifies that if an MNE
Group which does not have equity interests traded on a public securities
exchange use consolidated financial statements based on accounting
principles/standards different from those that are used to determine the
existence of and membership of a group under Article 1.1 of the Model
Legislation, then such MNE Group will still be required to calculate 'total
consolidated group revenue’ for the purposes of Article 1.3 based on the
accounting standards to be used for identifying a group under Article 1.1.;
On the second issue, OECD Guidance states that if a jurisdiction does not
in practice meet the conditions of confidentiality, appropriate use or
consistency, a Competent Authority may temporarily suspend the exchange of
information by giving notice in writing if it is determined that there is or
there has been significant non-compliance by the other Competent Authority;
However, noting that consequences of non-compliance with conditions of
confidentiality, consistency and appropriate use will depend on the terms of
the Qualifying Competent Authority Agreement (QCAA) between the jurisdictions,
OECD Guidance clarifies that “Because a temporary suspension of exchange of
information under Section 8 is in accordance with the terms of the relevant
QCAA, this does not constitute Systemic Failure”; Separately, OECD also
releases compilation of approaches adopted by member jurisdictions of the
Inclusive Framework with respect to issues where the guidance allows for
alternative approaches
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment