HC
dismisses assessee’s challenge to validity of demand notice issued towards
recovery of sales tax arrears under CST Act on account of failure to furnish
Form F in respect of goods consigned to agents in other States; Notes
assessee’s contention that he duly submitted Form F declaration to Assessing
Authority in terms of Section 6A of CST Act, and since he closed business due
to fire accident, Assessing Authority ought to have sent the notice and
assessment orders on residential address instead of business address; States,
these factual assertions having been urged for the first time, cannot be
entertained in writ proceedings since it fails to afford opportunity to Revenue
to rebut the same, moreover, assessee failed to intimate the fact of
discontinuance of business and name of person authorized to receive assessment
order on his behalf, which indicates that assessee possessed the hard copy of
order; Further observes that absent challenge to the assessment orders, demand
notice cannot be set aside on the ground that same are void and non est in the
eyes of law or that assessment should be ignored as a nullity; Remarks, as long
as assessment order is within the stipulated period of limitation, it is
inconsequential whether same is passed immediately after end of assessment year
/ period, or at fag end before expiry thereof, also rejects assessee’s
contention that intra-State sales were being treated as inter-state sales
: Telangana & Andhra Pradesh HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
P&H HC holds exporter eligible for refund of interest paid under Rule 96A on subsequent realisation of export proceeds
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) 1 on the validity of paragraph 4.6 of Circular No. ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
E very non-resident individual or organisation should obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) number if they receive an income and...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
No comments:
Post a Comment