Bengaluru ITAT directs
Flipkart India Pvt Ltd. (‘assessee’) to pay 50% of demand of Rs.109.52 Cr and
furnish bank guarantee for balance, relying upon ITAT stay order in Google
India approved "in spirit" by HC, directs registry to advance appeal
hearing date to April 9, 2018; Notes that AO treated the loss incurred as
capital expenditure observing that discounts offered to customers
were intended to build up brand value/monopoly or primacy in the
online market and determined total income at 408 Cr adopting sales price
at which the assessee could have sold the products, based
on comparable profit earned by entities engaged in similar line of
business; ITAT rejects assessee's contention that AO estimated turnover without
rejecting books of accounts and applied TP principles to transactions with
unrelated parties, observes that "AO merely adopted the methodology
to arrive at the value of realization, had the products would have been
sold with profit motive" and thus holds judicial precedents relied on by
assessee to be not applicable; Observes that assessee did not advance any
argument as to patent error in methodology adopted by tax authorities or
rebutting the stand that assessee's loss in the form of discount was nothing
but intangibles; Holds that no case was made out about financial hardship and
"there is every possibility of availability of liquidity in the
company on account of receipt of huge share capital and huge share
premium"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment