Karnataka HC dismisses
assessee’s (a Trust running 13 Educational Institutions) writ, upholds
withdrawal of Sec. 10(23C) exemption with retrospective effect from April 1,
2009 (i.e. the date on which approval was granted) onwards; Revenue had
withdrawn exemption based on a search and seizure operation conducted in
December, 2015 on assessee’s various premises which revealed cash donations
(capitation fees) collected from students for admission to medical courses and
utilized for personal gains of trustees; Observes that approval u/s. 10(23C)
was thoroughly misused by the trustees, notes that a staggering sum of Rs. 52
cr. of capitation fees was booked under the innocuous name of ‘Anonymous
Donations’ which was clearly against public policy and specifically prohibited
by SC in various cases; Holds that “Trust had indulged in illegal activities …
and rather various other business activities of the family of Trustees and
their money was passing through the cover and shields of the Books of Accounts
of the petitioner - Trust rendering it as merely a skeleton for the purpose of
exemption..”, remarks that “the petitioner - Trust cannot be allowed to cry wolf
on the anvil of breach of principles of natural justice.”; Upholding exemption
withdrawal from April 2009 onwards, HC states that “illegalities and
transactions offending the said provisions cannot be split or bifurcated for
the period in question only after the search and seizure operations were
carried out on 16/12/2015 and the illegality cannot be allowed to be
perpetuated for the preceding periods for which such evidence pointing out the
illegalities exist on record.”, distinguishes assessee’s reliance on SC rulings
in Queen’s Educational Society and American Hotel and Lodging Association
Educational Institute, Rajasthan HC ruling in Geetanjali University Trust:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
P&H HC holds exporter eligible for refund of interest paid under Rule 96A on subsequent realisation of export proceeds
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) 1 on the validity of paragraph 4.6 of Circular No. ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
E very non-resident individual or organisation should obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) number if they receive an income and...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
No comments:
Post a Comment