Mumbai ITAT rules that
payment by Reliance Communication Ltd. (‘assessee’) to non-resident vendors
(based in Australia, Israel, Sweden, Singapore and USA) for supplying software,
not royalty under respective DTAA, holds it as payment for 'copyrighted
article' and not ‘copyright’ itself; Observes that all software license agreements
stipulate that the assessee would be using the software for ‘operation of its
wireless network only’ and it was prevented from utilizing the software for
commercial uses; Further, observes that copyrights in the software were not
transferred to the customers and access to the ‘source codes’ in the software
was not granted to assessee, also there was restriction on copying the
software; Moreover, ITAT observes that in individual supplier's hands (i.e.
Nortel Networks India International Inc. USA, Team Telecom International Ltd.,
Israel, Motorola Inc USA, Alcatel USA International Marketing Inc USA, ZTE
Corporation China and Ericsson AB Sweden), the Courts / Tribunals have held
that sums received by them from assessee for supply of software for wireless
network were not taxable and that the payments could not be termed as royalty;
Cites plethora of rulings including Madras HC ruling in Neyveli Lignite
Corporation Ltd., Delhi HC ruling in Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co.Ltd.,
rejects Revenue’s reliance on Karnataka HC ruling in Samsung, relies on SC
ruling in Pradip J. Mehta to hold that when two views were possible, then the
interpretation in favour of the taxpayer should be adopted:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
When the CFO Leaves, Who Owns the Digital Keys?
- CA SAKSHI AGARWAL Let’s start with a small story in this regard. Client B, a rapidly growing mid-sized manufacturing firm, recently ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
The Reserve Bank of India has introduced a new framework governing export and import transactions under FEMA. These regulations are effectiv...
-
The posting had been move to another website. Please click the link below to get the access of the same. https://taxofindia.wordpress....
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is warranted even if assessee makes false claim of Sec 80IA benefits ...
-
Vide Notification issued u/s 139(1), the CBDT has extended the ‘due date’ for filing of returns of income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 ...
-
What is a Digital Signature? Answer: A digital signature authenticates electronic documents in a similar manner a handwritten signatur...
-
The overall effective tax rate of a U.S. multinational corporation may have significant impact on the value of its stock. Therefore, it ...
-
While Safe Harbour focuses on standardization, an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) provides a customized solution. An APA is a binding agr...
-
At first glance, the distinction appears straightforward. Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares (CCPS) are preference shares, while C...
-
One of the most significant developments under GST valuation jurisprudence has been the consistent recognition that where the recipient is...
No comments:
Post a Comment