Bombay HC upholds ITAT
order, rules that capital gains arising to assessee during AY 2005-06 on
assignment of development rights, in respect of the immovable property, to a
builder is to be computed based on the amount actually received by assessee,
rejects adoption of stamp duty valuation u/s. 50C; The assessee had entered
into a MOU with the Builder providing them with development rights in respect
of property for a consideration of Rs. 2.51 cr; Firstly, HC notes that there
was a gap of nearly 3 years between the date of execution of the MOU and the
execution of a formal development agreement and the stamp duty authority had
assessed the value of the property on the date of the execution of development
agreement; Next, HC notes that the stamp valuation was for a larger area
whereas the assessee had assigned the development rights only with respect to a
smaller area; In light of these two significant factors, HC notes that ITAT had
not adopted the stamp duty valuation, remarks that, “we do not find that the Tribunal
has committed any error.”:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment