Delhi ITAT allows deduction
u/s. 37(1) to PepsiCo India (assessee) for sponsorship fees paid to ICC during
AY 2009-10; Rejects Revenue’s stand that since the expenditure benefitted other
group entities across the globe, it could not be said to have been incurred
wholly and exclusively for the business of the assessee; ITAT clarifies that
“Benefit factor to other related parties is relevant under transfer pricing
provision and not while allowability of business expense u/s. 37(1)”; Observes
that the commercial expediency was not disputed, further acknowledges that
owing to large viewership of Cricket, advertising on such platforms is common;
Separately, treats subsidy received under West Bengal Incentive Scheme of 2004
as a capital receipt as it was given for the purpose of industrialization of
the State, notes that it was based upon fixed capital investment made by
assessee and only the mode of disbursement was in the form of re-payment of
sales tax paid.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment