Visakhapatnam ITAT rejects
taxability u/s. 56(2)(vii)(c) in the hands of assessee-individual for share
allotment under 'rights issue' in a family owned company at less than fair
market value during AY 2013-14; The entire shareholding in a closely held
company was held by assessee alongwith 7 of his close relatives [as defined
under explanation to 56(2)(vii)(c)], during subject AY, the company issued the
equity shares on rights basis for which only the assessee had applied and the
other relatives did not choose to subscribe for the rights issue; Rejects
Revenue’s stand that since there is no relation between the company and the
assessee there is no case for invoking the explanation of ‘relative’ to exempt
the assessee from taxing the excess fair market value; ITAT observes that
though the assessee had received the excess shares, renouncement was from the
close relatives, ITAT rules that “surrender of the rights of the close
relatives in favour of another close relative is covered for exemption u/s
56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act,”; ITAT concludes that the transactions between close
relatives are outside the scope of application of 56(2)(vii)(c) and should not
be seen as introducing black money or evasion of the tax, cites Chennai ITAT
ruling in Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka HC ruling in R. Nagaraja Rao,
Madras HC ruling in Kay Arr Enterprises.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment