Visakhapatnam ITAT rejects
taxability u/s. 56(2)(vii)(c) in the hands of assessee-individual for share
allotment under 'rights issue' in a family owned company at less than fair
market value during AY 2013-14; The entire shareholding in a closely held
company was held by assessee alongwith 7 of his close relatives [as defined
under explanation to 56(2)(vii)(c)], during subject AY, the company issued the
equity shares on rights basis for which only the assessee had applied and the
other relatives did not choose to subscribe for the rights issue; Rejects
Revenue’s stand that since there is no relation between the company and the
assessee there is no case for invoking the explanation of ‘relative’ to exempt
the assessee from taxing the excess fair market value; ITAT observes that
though the assessee had received the excess shares, renouncement was from the
close relatives, ITAT rules that “surrender of the rights of the close
relatives in favour of another close relative is covered for exemption u/s
56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act,”; ITAT concludes that the transactions between close
relatives are outside the scope of application of 56(2)(vii)(c) and should not
be seen as introducing black money or evasion of the tax, cites Chennai ITAT
ruling in Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka HC ruling in R. Nagaraja Rao,
Madras HC ruling in Kay Arr Enterprises.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) held that income or disallowances relating to a predeces...
No comments:
Post a Comment