Delhi ITAT rules that there
is no PE of assessee (a UAE co. engaged in providing solutions for subsea
off-shore construction industry) on account of the grouting activities carried
out in India during AY 2007-08; Accepts assessee’s stand that the grouting activities
fall within the construction activity as contemplated in specific provision of
Article 5(2)(h), and since the number of days spent in India was less than the
stipulated period of 9 months, there was no PE trigger for the assessee in
India; Revenue had argued that Article 5(1) squarely applies to the assessee,
further Revenue had argued that the assessee has equipment PE in India, lastly
it was also contended that even movables place of business may constitute a PE
despite they are temporary in location; Firstly, ITAT applies the maxim,
“generalia specialibus non deroganf' i.e, a general provision would not be
applicable when specific provision is there, next ITAT clarifies that merely
because grouting is not a simple masonry work and involves complex aspects, it
does not take it out of the construction activities as mentioned in Article
5(2)(h), “…and any further classification [as done by the Revenue] would amount
to rewriting DTAA.”; Lastly, rejects Revenue’s stand that since the assessee
indulged in on-going projects, 9 months stipulation cannot be applied, states
that PE determination has to be made for each AY and with reference to DTAA
provision.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment