Pune ITAT rules that
service of notice u/s. 143(2) on the manager of assessee-firm and not partners,
would not invalidate the assessment proceedings for AY 2010-11; Observes that
though the assessee had raised objection before the AO during the course of
assessment proceedings itself that the notice was not properly served, the
authorized representative (AR) of the assessee appearing before the AO gave his
‘no objection’ for furthering the assessment proceedings; ITAT remarks that
“the proviso to section 292BB of the Act, which was triggered by raising an
initial objection before the AO, was given a go by and got set to rest by the
ld. AR not objecting to such objection in terms of order sheet entry..”; ITAT
rules that once the proviso is held to be inapplicable, the main provision of
Sec. 292BB gets magnetized, which deems proper service of notice on assessee;
Further clarifies that once an assessee empowers his AR to appear in the income
tax proceedings and undertakes to ratify his acts, there is no need to ignore
any concession made by the ld. AR and personally call upon the assessee to make
concession in every case, distinguishes assessee’s reliance on SC ruling in
Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society on facts:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Karnataka HC holds HSNS Cess framework unconstitutional due to manner of Cess calculation
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
No comments:
Post a Comment