Pune ITAT rules that
service of notice u/s. 143(2) on the manager of assessee-firm and not partners,
would not invalidate the assessment proceedings for AY 2010-11; Observes that
though the assessee had raised objection before the AO during the course of
assessment proceedings itself that the notice was not properly served, the
authorized representative (AR) of the assessee appearing before the AO gave his
‘no objection’ for furthering the assessment proceedings; ITAT remarks that
“the proviso to section 292BB of the Act, which was triggered by raising an
initial objection before the AO, was given a go by and got set to rest by the
ld. AR not objecting to such objection in terms of order sheet entry..”; ITAT
rules that once the proviso is held to be inapplicable, the main provision of
Sec. 292BB gets magnetized, which deems proper service of notice on assessee;
Further clarifies that once an assessee empowers his AR to appear in the income
tax proceedings and undertakes to ratify his acts, there is no need to ignore
any concession made by the ld. AR and personally call upon the assessee to make
concession in every case, distinguishes assessee’s reliance on SC ruling in
Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society on facts:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Taxation of Intangible assets acquired through business restructuring.
1. Background 1.1 When a company aims to acquire another company's business through amalgamation or demerger, assets or ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
Introduction It's important for taxpayers to have a clear understanding of the available allowances and deductions, as they can grea...
-
· Mumbai ITAT in the case of Mukesh Harilal Mehta held that Exemption U/S 54 cannot be denied merely due to mistake by the developer.
-
Earlier this year, the Mauritius Government approved the amendment to the India – Mauritius tax treaty, aligning it with the proposal of th...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] dealing with the issue of denial of input tax credit (ITC) ...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent instruction issued by the SEZ Division, Department of Commerce, clarifying various concerns relating t...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
No comments:
Post a Comment