Mumbai ITAT quashes
revision u/s 263 made by Pr.CIT on the grounds that there was no nexus between
fictitious capital assets purchase & subsequent routing back as share
capital in assessee Group; Notes that Pr.CIT had initiated revisionary
proceedings on 4 grounds – allowance of bogus depreciation for the purpose of
115JB, acceptance of the withdrawal claims for deprecation without referring to
the schedule of assets, non-consideration of addition of bogus share capital
u/s 68 and AO not ordering a special audit/ rejecting the books of accounts;
Notes that AO had consciously not disallowed the depreciation amount from the
computation of book profits u/s. 115JB and had applied his mind in doing so,
also holds that no addition u/s 68 could be made as assessee had explained the
scam entries and all details were available during assessment proceedings
itself; Opines that it was a clearly & legally permissible view that inflow
in the form of bogus capital was related to the fictitious capital purchased
coming from the same source; Also dismisses Pr.CIT’s ground to reject the books
of accounts stating that the addition on account of bogus deprecation withdrawn
would itself come under ‘cloud’ as there would be no case of making further
additions based upon the figures of the same books; Observing that no material
pertaining to introduction of share capital from other sources had been found
in the search or as a result of investigation or on record, ITAT concludes that
there was no reason or any justification on the part of the AO to further make
detailed enquiry for the source of share capital:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gujarat HC upholds levy of GST on corporate guarantee while reads down mandatory 1% valuation where actual consideration is lower
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Gujarat High Court (HC)1 on the taxability of corporate guarantee provided by the Petitio...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
The posting had been move to another website. Please click the link below to get the access of the same. https://taxofindia.wordpress....
-
"whether tds should be deducted u/s 194C for payment made to travel agent for booking of airline tickets by a company for its employee...
-
Any tax, interest, penalty, fine or any other sum payable by virtue of an order passed under the Income Tax Act as specified in the ...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...
-
The India-Mauritius DTAA, which entered into force on 1 April 1983, was amended by way of Protocol signed on 10 May 2016 [1] (2016 Protoc...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Gujarat High Court (HC)1 on the taxability of corporate guarantee provided by the Petitio...
-
The overall effective tax rate of a U.S. multinational corporation may have significant impact on the value of its stock. Therefore, it ...
No comments:
Post a Comment