Mumbai ITAT quashes
revision u/s 263 made by Pr.CIT on the grounds that there was no nexus between
fictitious capital assets purchase & subsequent routing back as share
capital in assessee Group; Notes that Pr.CIT had initiated revisionary
proceedings on 4 grounds – allowance of bogus depreciation for the purpose of
115JB, acceptance of the withdrawal claims for deprecation without referring to
the schedule of assets, non-consideration of addition of bogus share capital
u/s 68 and AO not ordering a special audit/ rejecting the books of accounts;
Notes that AO had consciously not disallowed the depreciation amount from the
computation of book profits u/s. 115JB and had applied his mind in doing so,
also holds that no addition u/s 68 could be made as assessee had explained the
scam entries and all details were available during assessment proceedings
itself; Opines that it was a clearly & legally permissible view that inflow
in the form of bogus capital was related to the fictitious capital purchased
coming from the same source; Also dismisses Pr.CIT’s ground to reject the books
of accounts stating that the addition on account of bogus deprecation withdrawn
would itself come under ‘cloud’ as there would be no case of making further
additions based upon the figures of the same books; Observing that no material
pertaining to introduction of share capital from other sources had been found
in the search or as a result of investigation or on record, ITAT concludes that
there was no reason or any justification on the part of the AO to further make
detailed enquiry for the source of share capital:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment