Delhi ITAT deletes Rs.
1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that
set off of non-refundable entry fee paid by group co. (UW) to DoT in 2008,
against the fresh spectrum fee payable by assessee towards allocation of
telecom licenses cannot be regarded as 'transfer' u/s 2(47); Assessee and
Unitech Wireless (Tamilnadu) Pvt. Ltd (UW) are both part of the Norwegian based
Telenor group, assessee had acquired fresh telecom licenses for a spectrum fee
of Rs. 4018 cr. in November, 2012, and had requested DoT to consider the set
off of entry fee of Rs 1658.57 cr. already paid by UW in 2008 for grant of 22
unified access service licenses (‘UASL’), which were then quashed by SC;
Subsequently in December 2012, assessee acquired UW’s business on going concern
basis and entered into business transfer agreement (BTA) and Actionable Claim
Agreement whereby UW transferred all the rights, claims, other rights against
the DoT including the payment of license fee for consideration of Rs. 100 cr.;
Rejects Revenue’s stand that the right acquired by assessee under the
actionable claim agreement constituted a ‘capital asset’ u/s. 2(14) and that
the said right was exercised by assessee in March, 2014, being the date on
which the set off was allowed by DoT; Further rejects Revenue’s stand that
consequent to the set off, capital asset acquired by assessee was extinguished
and thus there was a ‘transfer’ u/s. 2(47) of a short term capital asset (being
held for a period less than 36 months); ITAT holds that 'right' which is not
enforceable by law, cannot be regarded as a 'capital asset', thus holds that
assessee had not acquired any capital asset from UW under the Actionable Claim
agreement since UW did not hold such asset at any point of time.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment