Pune ITAT rejects Revenue’s
action of invoking Sec. 80AB to deny assessee-builder’s Sec. 80IB(10) claim for
AY 2009-10; During relevant AY, assessee had earned profits from eligible
projects and incurred loss in non-eligible projects, thereby resulting in overall
loss under the head `Profits and gains of business or profession’, accordingly
AO had invoked Sec. 80AB and denied assessee’s claim of deduction u/s.
80IB(10); Rejects Revenue’s action of considering loss from non-eligible
projects and eventually total business loss for making assessee ineligible for
deduction u/s.80IB(10); Referring to Sections 80AB & 80B(5), ITAT opines
that, “it is the income of the eligible projects alone which should be
considered on standalone basis, rather than the income under the head `Profits
and gains of business or profession’, for the purposes of granting deduction,
albeit with the overall ceiling of the gross total income.”; ITAT states that
since the amount of eligible income, as claimed by the assessee, is less than the
amount of gross total income, the provisions of Sec. 80AB do not apply
adversely to such a situation.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Big Brother is Counting: How the Taxman Knows About Your Stock Sales and FD Interest
Let’s start with a small story in this regard. Mr. A, a mid-level software engineer, felt incredibly confident about his tax return last...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
CIT vs. Kan Construction And Colonizers (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) The assessee sold a plot of land for Rs. 79 lakhs. The AO held th...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment