Delhi HC confirms ITAT
order holding that the amount received by assessee (engaged in providing basic
telecom services) on sale of prepaid cards to the extent of unutilized talk
time did not accrue as income in the year of sale i.e. AYs 2003-04, 2004-05
& 2009-10; Approves assessee’s mode of recognizing revenue on prepaid cards
on the basis of actual usage and carrying forward unutilized amount outstanding
on the prepaid cards to the next year in view of the matching principles for
revenue recognition as enshrined in the Accounting Standards, rejects Revenue’s
stand that assessee must account for the entire amount; However, HC states that
Revenue’s contention that the prepaid amount once paid and received by assessee
was forgone by the subscriber and accordingly appropriated by assessee is
substantially correct; At the same time, HC clarifies that “the payment was an
advance and was subject to the respondent-assessee providing basic telecom
service as promised, failing which the unutilized amount was required to be
refunded to the pre-paid subscribers” under the ordinary law of contract or
special enactments like the Consumer Protection Act; Lastly, HC rules that “unutilized
amount when the prepaid card lapses has to be treated as income or receipt of
the respondent-assessee on the date when the card had lapsed.”:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Navigating Section 79: How Continuity of Beneficial Ownership Preserves Loss Carry-Forward
A recent ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ACIT vs. Lurgi India International Services Pvt. Ltd. provides crucial ...
-
Introduction: ADR’S, GDR’S: These are commonly known as Depository Receipts (‘DR’), a negotiable security issued outside India by a deposi...
-
The Approving Panel under General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), in a landmark direction, has characterized the demerger of Digital, Media a...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
The Hon’ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (‘Tribunal’) recently held that long-term capital gains (LTCG) arising to Fullerto...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
A recent discussion with a colleague highlighted a key international tax dilemma: when an Indian company buys back shares from a non-residen...
-
In Standard Castings Private Limited v. ITO , the Hon’ble ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal and set aside a demand that had continu...
No comments:
Post a Comment