Delhi HC confirms ITAT
order holding that the amount received by assessee (engaged in providing basic
telecom services) on sale of prepaid cards to the extent of unutilized talk
time did not accrue as income in the year of sale i.e. AYs 2003-04, 2004-05
& 2009-10; Approves assessee’s mode of recognizing revenue on prepaid cards
on the basis of actual usage and carrying forward unutilized amount outstanding
on the prepaid cards to the next year in view of the matching principles for
revenue recognition as enshrined in the Accounting Standards, rejects Revenue’s
stand that assessee must account for the entire amount; However, HC states that
Revenue’s contention that the prepaid amount once paid and received by assessee
was forgone by the subscriber and accordingly appropriated by assessee is
substantially correct; At the same time, HC clarifies that “the payment was an
advance and was subject to the respondent-assessee providing basic telecom
service as promised, failing which the unutilized amount was required to be
refunded to the pre-paid subscribers” under the ordinary law of contract or
special enactments like the Consumer Protection Act; Lastly, HC rules that “unutilized
amount when the prepaid card lapses has to be treated as income or receipt of
the respondent-assessee on the date when the card had lapsed.”:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Karnataka HC holds HSNS Cess framework unconstitutional due to manner of Cess calculation
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
No comments:
Post a Comment